17.3.2009.
Tuesday, 17th. March.
What's the deal, dude ? So, check it out !. Got to look at 4 cases, man. Isa Samad, Ali Rustam, Khairy Jamaluddin and Khir Toyo. The facts of the cases are exactly the same - buying votes. The sentences can hardly be more bizarre. Isa got suspended from UMNO and sacked from the government, Ali is only stopped from contesting the Deputy President's post, Khairy got only a warning, and Khir is scot-free. To say that the comparison is like night and day is to be unbelievably charitable.
I wonder what kind of legal brains they have in the UMNO Disciplinary Board.
I know there are a couple of lawyers there. I also know the quality of the legal mind of one of them. Less than you'd expect.. But even if I were to say that these were fair men before this last laughable episode, now I say "enough of this shit !"
How in hell did the wonderful Board manage to distinguish between these cases. If everyone is hauled up, then there must be enough evidence. Remember, this is no court of law. And yet it may take a Lord Denning to sieve through the pained reasoning of the Board to come to this absolutely criminal finding.
What I'm saying here is not even to implicate the rottenness of UMNO today - that in these 4 cases mentioned are possible future PM material of Bolehland. That thought by itself sends a shudder down my spine. What I'm taking issue now is the incomprehensible way that UMNO and its machinery make decisions. How can it allow its already tottering image to slide further into inevitable oblivion by simply watching this ass of a Board, with a donkey as its chief, making a bigger mess of the crap that was put before it to solve? My utter condemnation of the due process of the Board is no comfort for the utter despair at what the future holds for my children in Bolehland under the management of a group of ass-holes.
........................................................................................................
2 comments:
Wow, very strong comments indeed. I agree with the obvious discepencies in the decisions but then we don't know the facts of the case. Perhaps they should be revealed to the public, Many decisions are now questionable because the facts are not made known for the public to judge. Org kecil suap wang sepuluh-duapuluh ringgit namanya rasuah. Ahli politik suap wang berribu-ribu ( atau juta) namanya politik wang, komisyen, apa saja. Double standard ini yag akan jatuhkan negara.
Post a Comment